The Culture War and Multiculturalism in Ishmeal Reeds Japanese by Essay - 1

The Culture War and Multiculturalism in Ishmeal Reeds Japanese by Spring - Essay Example 23. 1993).† Reed consequently touches on the careerist academics as he attacks them for their complicity in relation to the Ivory Towers that served as a sign of white supremacist structure of power. From the novel, it is apparent that there is need for persons from different cultures to become involved in order to enhance in integrating with each other. In his work, Reed presents Culture war as a tool that promotes multiculturalism because it serves as the cause of conflict among individuals from different cultural groups. The satire directed at these debates not only result from Reed’s success in presenting a stinging critique especially through an analysis of the Afro-Asian towards white supremacy as well as American imperialism. In an effective manner, the author portrays how individuals defending white Western view of history focused on trafficking everything in a revisionism manner as well as a â€Å"feel-good ethnocentrism† an approach used to attribute to multiculturalists. Based on the concepts that Ishmael Reed depicts, it is right to classify the novel as a â€Å"critical multiculturalism.† The term ‘critical multiculturalism’ serves as an indication that the piece of literature is out to expose fissures, tensions as well as possible contradictory demands resulting from multiple cultures as opposed to celebrating multiculturalism in an appreciative manner. Reeds goes further to dig deep in presenting the meaning of ‘culture war’ where he present s an absurd comic potential as he insists that the real wars of the 20th century that occurred in the U.S are similar to rhetoric of cultural wars. The opening paragraph of the literary material serves in presenting the creativity of the author through presentation of an effective examination of multiculturalism as well as academia to the later emphasis on

Eliezer's Struggle to Keep his Faith in God Essay

Eliezer's Struggle to Keep his Faith in God - Essay Example Elie lost a mother and a small sister during the holocaust that aimed at slaughtering the Jews. Elie confronts the worst in humanity and the worst in him (Bloom, 39). Despite this dilapidating and worse environment, Elie keeps faith in God, though in sceptical on the delay to safeguard His people. It is vital to notice that, Wiesel perception about God changes when nothing happens to rescue people from the hands of the Germans. Wiesel remains sceptical on how God handles situations (Bloom, 38). This change in mind however does not change Elsie’s belief in God’s existence. It is noticeable that, Wiesel believes that, God’s power should be manifested in hard situations especially those facing the Jews. It is imperative to note that, Elie loses faith in God during the de-humanization process that was instituted by the Nazis, but continues to believe that, God exists. This context vividly explains Wiesel’s mind and understanding about God. Wiesel believes that , God is supernatural and no one can kill the dreams about God (Bloom, 34). It is however, paradoxical to realize that, the Nazis murder Elie’s vision about God. Elie laments, â€Å"Never shall I forget those flames which consumed my faith. Never shall I forget that nocturnal silence which deprived me, for all eternity, of the desire to live† it is flamboyant that the tone of anger and indelible grief in this passage reveals. Elie’s deep passionate feelings and believe about God was cleared off by the Nazi in a profound disillusionment (Bloom, 34). Wiesel believes that, the fear of God should be extended and manifested in human beings (Bloom, 56). This concept is vividly revealed in the love and passionate feelings expressed by Elie towards his ailing and weak father. Wiesel believes that God does the same to humankind. Elie is seen not thinking of abandoning his father, but of how to keep from losing him. This is exactly what God does to humanity (Bloom, 34). W iesel believes that, God does not abandon people but sticks with them. This context brings in a paradox, in that many people died and t question that disturbs Wiesel emerges, â€Å"Where is God?† After a dramatic execution of a resistance fighter at the camp, in which the young boy is strangled on the gallows because he is too light to break his neck, Elie’s disillusionment is markedly angrier and bitterer (Bloom, 39). Elie’s indulgence and perception about God tends to change after this incident. It is noteworthy, that Elie doubts God’s presence and undertaking. This is evident by the voice of man asking Elie from the background â€Å"where is God?† This depicts the change of mind and passion in God’s faith (Bloom, 40). Despite what Elie witnesses, a staunch element of trust takes centre stage, particularly, when a background voice answers the question on the presence of God. â€Å"He is here; He is hanging here on this gallows† (Blo om, 36). The happening of these events is attributable to Wiesel’s change in faith about God (Bloom, 39). It is imperative to note that, before the holocaust, Wiesel believed that, God is the sole protector and retaliator of the Jewish people. Wiesel believed that, whatever had happened before was according to God‘s great plans on the Jewish people (Bloom, 41). Wiesel accepted God’s will without further questioning. More over, when things got